What must be considered if using non-CG equipment during pollution response?

When using non-CG (non-Coast Guard) equipment during pollution response, it is crucial to consider that this equipment must be paid for if it is damaged. This highlights the financial implications of using such equipment, emphasizing the need to ensure that proper risk assessments and financial responsibilities are clearly understood before deployment. Non-CG equipment may not fall under the same regulatory or funding protections as CG equipment, thereby placing the burden of costs on the user in the event of damage.

This consideration is particularly important in pollution response scenarios where rapid action is essential, but the costs associated with using external equipment can significantly affect operational planning and resource allocation. Understanding this financial aspect can help responders make informed decisions and ensure that they are prepared for potential liabilities.